Devil_666
Super Freak
Damn, 6 years old and already a drug addict. Kids grow up so fast. One minute they're crawling around in diapers and the next thing you know they're smoking crack in airports.
Damn, 6 years old and already a drug addict. Kids grow up so fast. One minute they're crawling around in diapers and the next thing you know they're smoking crack in airports.
All suburban communities should be gated as well. Retinal scans required for entry.
So what do you suggest? Just let anyone on without checking them at all or their luggage? How about we get rid of passports too? Hell.....I'm game for letting anyone in our country! Let them do whatever! We can just take our chances.
The Ween said:
btw.....I've had to be fingerprinted and had an FBI background check done since 9-11 for my job. I've also had several physicals.
I kill spiders.
I suggest using a rational security policy. What's in place now is not providing security. It's a farce, and people face the threat of severe penalty if they don't pretend it is.
So just out of curiosity what would your policy be?
Look up Israeli airport security.
Profiling. With the exception of people on its terrorist watch list, the U.S. Transportation and Security Administration treats all travelers about the same. Everyone goes through the same machines and shows the same documents, only receiving additional checks if the regular procedures turn up a problem. Israeli security, by contrast, separates travelers into two groups before they ever get to an x-ray machine. All passengers waiting to check in speak to a polyglot agent. The agents, most of whom are female, ask a series of questions, looking for nerves or inconsistent statements. While the vast majority of travelers pass the question and answer session and have a pretty easy time going through security—there are no full-body scans, for example— between 2 percent and 5 percent of travelers get singled out for additional screening. The exact selection criteria aren't publicly available, but ethnicity is probably a consideration. (Former U.S. Health and Human Service Secretary Donna Shalala was interrogated in July, presumably because of her Lebanese heritage.)
If you think being selected for additional screening in U.S. airports is tough, you obviously haven't faced an Israeli interrogator. Secondary screening can involve hours of questioning. Agents have been known to click through all of a traveler's digital photographs. Body searches are common, and agents usually take luggage apart one item at a time. Israeli agents confiscated all the luggage of Indiana University professor Heather Bradshaw and kept it for three days.
Advertisement
There's more to Israeli airport security than the secondary-screening selection process. Officials think of passengers as passing through a series of concentric circles, with increasing scrutiny as they get closer to boarding the plane. Agents also pay close attention to the parts of the airport that passengers don't frequent. They monitor the fences around the airport's perimeter with cameras at all times, and radar systems check for intrusions when the weather prevents the cameras from seeing. Security officials subject all vehicles to a weight sensor, a trunk x-ray, and an undercarriage scan.
Israeli researchers are developing technology that could ease racial profiling concerns, like innovative check-in kiosks to replace the human selectors. When a traveler steps up to the machine, it senses his body temperature, blood pressure, and heart rate, just as in a polygraph exam. At some point during the interaction, the kiosk presents a statement that would elicit a reaction from a would-be terrorist. It might instruct him to see an agent, or just remind the passenger that flight security is everyone's responsibility. If the flyer's vital signs shift, he would be subject to secondary screening. But while officials in the U.S., Europe, and Canada are considering the high-tech solution, Israeli officials haven't shown much interest. They think that security risks at Israeli airports require human profilers.
Civil rights concerns notwithstanding, Israeli security screeners can make a claim that their U.S. counterparts probably can't—they've actually caught a terrorist red-handed. When the girlfriend of Jordanian terrorist Nizar Hindawi tried to carry a bomb onto an El Al flight out of London's Heathrow airport in 1986, security agents working for the Israeli airline and using Israeli screening methods successfully identified her as a potential threat and foiled the plot.
I'm sure Teemu would be just fine with those measures^^
If you think being selected for additional screening in U.S. airports is tough, you obviously haven't faced an Israeli interrogator. Secondary screening can involve hours of questioning. Agents have been known to click through all of a traveler's digital photographs. Body searches are common, and agents usually take luggage apart one item at a time. Israeli agents confiscated all the luggage of Indiana University professor Heather Bradshaw and kept it for three days.
Exactly! This part is my favorite:
If you think being selected for additional screening in U.S. airports is tough, you obviously haven't faced an Israeli interrogator. Secondary screening can involve hours of questioning. Agents have been known to click through all of a traveler's digital photographs. Body searches are common, and agents usually take luggage apart one item at a time. Israeli agents confiscated all the luggage of Indiana University professor Heather Bradshaw and kept it for three days.
I see groping..... *waits* for dev76's justification....
My point is, I don't think anyone can get it right in todays wishy washy society. Not to mention in a day and age when people will kill themselves and likely blow up their children all in the name of religion. Also, you only hear about these "extreme cases". There were 9 million domestic flights in 2010. Out of those (yes millions) of flights how many issues like this received the national new's attention? Maybe a handful at best.
Everyone's got a better idea.....
Exactly! This part is my favorite:
My point is, I don't think anyone can get it right in todays wishy washy society. Not to mention in a day and age when people will kill themselves and likely blow up their children all in the name of religion. Also, you only hear about these "extreme cases". There were 9 million domestic flights in 2010. Out of those (yes millions) of flights how many issues like this received the national new's attention? Maybe a handful at best.
I'm more worried about the pervert filming this to be honest. Was it the parent? That would bother me even more I think.
Soon it will be so ex_____ve to fly, all this will be moot anyway.
While the vast majority of travelers pass the question and answer session and have a pretty easy time going through security—there are no full-body scans, for example— between 2 percent and 5 percent of travelers get singled out for additional screening.
BadMoon said:I'm sure profiling would go real far with our "politically correct" society
This is my favorite part:
So body searches are common in secondary searches among an infinitessimal proportion of passengers. The rest are treated as non-threats, which is my contention with American protocol--everyone is treated as an equal threat and they aren't. It's cowardice to ignore the fact that there is a distinct profile for those who would attempt a terrorist act, and it's immoral to subject those who do not even remotely fit the profile to the equivalent scrutiny when that scrutiny demands a gross invasion of physical privacy.
But the remaining 91% of Israeli passengers are never subject to full body scans. The criteria in an American airport for additional screening is refusal to submit to exactly that, which is completely arbitrary. How hard is it going to be to devise a way to smuggle a means of hijacking the plane that evades the body scanner?
The Israeli criteria actually targets people who might be a terrorist. That doesn't sound just a little more rational to you?