TSA gropes 6 year old! then drug tests her!

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't question it. They've been given ample just cause.

I would have thought we've had sufficent reason as well, but I guess we're a bit slower than they are. And considering that they have stopped attempts, and we've let every one by, I reckon they're ahead of the curve on realizing the potential for perfect world as well. At the very least, they can boast that they haven't given up on it yet.
 
A drug test? :/
The people that work for them are disturbed psychos. They are the weirdos that you went to school with and nobody not even the nerds liked.
Now they have a job that gives them a little bit of power and they abuse the hell out of it to get their own jollies.
 
There are two sides to every story. I don't get riled up about these occurrences. There are standard protocol set in place, and no matter how dumb you think they are, they're in place for whatever reason. Some people don't agree with any form of search at the airports, so they take simple facts and blow them up into circus events like this. If it's 100% true, then shame on them and time to do some revamping of the employment standards and search criteria, if not then people need to grow up.

Here's a tid-bit for you, inmate visitors at prisons have to get their hands marked with a marker that can only be seen under a UV light, and have to show it on their way out to verify they're the visitor and not the inmate escaping. Kids, even infants, have to go through this procedure. And before someone says that's like at Chuckee Cheese to make sure it's their kid. Nope, everyday they write a different number/letter combo on a random hand, and every inmate visitor gets marked like this. Dumb? Sure, but it's a protocol someone high up with a lot of power thought was a good idea, but they're not the ones enforcing it and ticking everyone off.
 
On the bright side, at least TSA was 100% certain that the 6 year old girl was not a threat to national security.

Exactly, I feel 110% safer now than I ever have. :lecture
 
A drug test? :/
The people that work for them are disturbed psychos. They are the weirdos that you went to school with and nobody not even the nerds liked.
Now they have a job that gives them a little bit of power and they abuse the hell out of it to get their own jollies.

CLUless.....:slap

No matter what security measures are put in place and enforced someone is gonna _____, complain and raise hell.

There's always a "victim" ...:dunno
 
Honestly, this thread title is misleading and suggests a child molester unjustly stopped this girl and fondled her. The female TSA agent conducted a proper pat search, and even identified when she was searching a "sensitive area", and informed everyone she was using the backs of her hands, which is proper procedure when conducting a pat search. And you think these radical groups that hijack airplanes and blow them up wouldn't use a 6 year old as a bomb? Then everyone would cry about why they were not searching children.

And love the upset mother saying a supervisor used non-verbal suggestions to make her comply with them searching her daughter. I feel that poor TSA agent is the victim here, for being made out to be some child molesting monster.

Hopefully a moderator changes this title to "TSA Agent PAT-SEARCHES 6 year old girl".
 
Honestly, this thread title is misleading and suggests a child molester unjustly stopped this girl and fondled her. The female TSA agent conducted a proper pat search, and even identified when she was searching a "sensitive area", and informed everyone she was using the backs of her hands, which is proper procedure when conducting a pat search. And you think these radical groups that hijack airplanes and blow them up wouldn't use a 6 year old as a bomb? Then everyone would cry about why they were not searching children.

And love the upset mother saying a supervisor used non-verbal suggestions to make her comply with them searching her daughter. I feel that poor TSA agent is the victim here, for being made out to be some child molesting monster.

Hopefully a moderator changes this title to "TSA Agent PAT-SEARCHES 6 year old girl".

But it wouldn't be a violation or conspiracy if it was labeled correctly....:lol
 
But it wouldn't be a violation or conspiracy if it was labeled correctly....:lol

Well then let's get it changed to "TSA Spygates 6 year old, while a second gunman shoots at her, and the government knew terrorists wanted to crash an airplane into her house and let it happen".



:)
 
Soon it will be so ex_____ve to fly, all this will be moot anyway.

I must've turned my lettering around in expensive. :lol

That's the way it used to be. And you know what? Service back then was top notch. All the young hot females were working on the planes and providing excellent customer service. :rotfl People actually enjoyed flying.

In all seriousness though when flying was more exclusive the service was WAY better. Now that any idiot can afford a ticket look what happened. Service goes down, no more hotties working (most are gay men or women over 40), and now we have all of these extra charges.

Take the extra charges away, bump ticket prices up by about $200, and bring the hotties and service back. All will be right with the world. :flag

Yeah, lucky you guys. The "hotties" as you call them would give you all good service and the hell with us woman on board. :lol
 
Did Weenie type what I think she typed here? :lol

Exclusive? :dunno Why is that a bad word?

Wait now I don't know what she typed? :mad:

Expen isve. :lecture

Yeah, I think she swapped an "s" and an "i".

:rotfl


Dang! pixletwin beat me to it! :slap

Well she is Ween. I would think Ween and pen is go hand in hand? Or sometimes hand to mouth. :yess:


Poor girl's subconscious is spilling out all over the place.

Bastards all of yas! :lol

I took my spelling lessons from King. :dunno
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top