Wasn't it proven/mentioned that the Origins suit is very similar to Bale's TDK suit?
So basically, the consensus is bar gameplay, Origins did everything better than some other Batman? Story and suit? That's what I'm noticing. >.> Also honestly, still prefer City's opening. Origins is nice but City had a lot more going on, and it felt pretty awesome actually controlling Bruce Wayne...and upper cutting Penguin
I mean that, that is just awesome.
So basically, the consensus is bar gameplay, Origins did everything better than some other Batman? Story and suit? That's what I'm noticing. >.> Also honestly, still prefer City's opening. Origins is nice but City had a lot more going on, and it felt pretty awesome actually controlling Bruce Wayne...and upper cutting Penguin
On Origins NECA and Play Arts, the NECa does look great, and is around the same price as the Play Arts. The Play Arts AO Batman isn't worth it, he has less accessories than the previous Arkham Bats actually, yet is $40 more. It also looks kinda bad. The NECA one has the same accessories I think, but due to his larger scale, better paint, and sculpt, it's a great deal. I just don't have room for it >.>
The Arkham games have had a good story, but it always came back to Joker. This was fine in Asylum because Joker starts up everything, but in City, Hugo Strange is made out to be the main antagonist. Same with Origins, which in my opinion, loses points for the reveal because that killed some of my interest.For the most part I agree. Though the story in Arkham City is just as good, almost. Gameplay though is where Arkham City is superior. Somehow Origins made the combat kinda screwed up. And there were some game-breaking glitches they never cared to fix. You couldnt even ever actually get 100% completion OR the only sin I actually wanted: Nightmare Batman.
