There was a time before Nolan really hit it big that you would have been a hipster to like him. Now it's swung around the other way. It's gas.
I agree, but I think both the term hipster and fanboy are often just copouts out of having to give a real counterargument. Not saying the terms aren't real or what they designate aren't real, but they're overused.
Nah. It's trendy lately to bash everything Nolan does. If you like his movies than you're considered a 'Nolanite.'
There definitely is a backlash going on that the man doesn't deserve imo. I'm a nolan fan, have massive issues with tdkr and was floored by just how underwhelming, sloppy and cliche interstellar was. But nevertheless, imo Nolan's overall someone with a brilliant oeuvre who now just gets a lot of nolan haters crawling out the woodwork now the Nolan-Batman fan gestapo is losing steam. It's all a bunch of nuance-lacking nonsense responses. Being critical doesn't make you a hipster, loving something doesn't make you a fanboy. A lack of nuance makes you either of those too.
Trendy? That's retarded. He made a very bad movie followed by a mediocre one. Given his previous track record, it's something he brought on himself. We have expectations now. Especially if he's going to continue to be snide and stuck up and say things like "real movies don't have after-credits scenes" etc.
All directors lose it eventually. Happened to Spielberg, Lucas, and Tarantino acknowledges it will happen to him which is why he may quit after Hateful Eight. Hopefully Nolan is just in a slump right now.
I don't excuse him, but I at least understand why TDKR sucked. He didn't want to do it. Supposedly so many Imax cameras and the inability to reshoot scenes or do multiple takes played a part. With this one, it was just a bit of a miss/rehash.
I don't really post in the movethreads anymore but I was curious how the response to Interstellar was.
I kinda agree Deckard, although less harshly, but I kinda feel Nolan wanted genuinely to finnish Bruce Wayne's story, but he had no inspiration left to make it a good Batman story. TDKR is not a Batman film, it's a bruce wayne film who puts on the suit one last time. And yeah the technical issues with TDKR, but also Interstellar, are really really saddening.
I feel like Nolan's simply taking too much on his plate. TDKR and Interstellar have so many cliche plot points (and TDKR at least had a better reason for them given the setup of the previous two films), I feel like Nolan's ambition with plot is highly mismatching his ambition technically, and that's starting to show. He seems to confuse simplicity with being cliche. You can have a very simple story and yet make it at least seem less cliche.
But the twists in TDKR and Interstellar are largely abysmal. And if a movie doesn't RELY on twists than that's okay, but Interstellar still relies on twists too much, it's like he's addicted to them. Nolan's starting to become gimmicky with them, and that makes the film imo genuinely Nolan's weakest since Following in all regards but production design. (Yeah Deckard I think the first act of TDKR and the general ambition to give Bruce Wayne an 'ending' makes up for more than just the ambition in interstellar to display a bunch of space physics. So yeah adding up all aspects TDKR is better than Interstellar imo.)
Have any of you read or or heard a summary of Jonah Nolan's original script for Spielberg? It was WAY bigger, but despite the sloppiness Jonah can have (which, as someone who's seen all of person of interest, becomes easy to recognise), I think that film would've been way better than what we got now. It was less human-centric, and it was less of a