cmiller99
Super Freak
I think that's a telling sign. Unintentional near incest isn't something that I think Lucas would have included if he knew exactly where the story was going.
I think that's a telling sign. Unintentional near incest isn't something that I think Lucas would have included if he knew exactly where the story was going.
I think he had general ideas in mind but yeah it's clear not everything was as well thought out as he'd like people to believe. Hell he couldn't even make up his mind as to what he wanted the final cuts of the films to be and had to keep making changes with each new home video release.
The look is great but I think I will hold off on making a decision until after I have seen the movie.
I think he had general ideas in mind but yeah it's clear not everything was as well thought out as he'd like people to believe. Hell he couldn't even make up his mind as to what he wanted the final cuts of the films to be and had to keep making changes with each new home video release.
Even if Lucas was merely throwing the audience off the scent it would be too strong for the Flash Gordon inspired movies he was creating. (Considering that the original pulp serial cliffhangers were made specifically for a child audience).
Why is there a SSC Yoda's Hut on display? Look on the right.
If I remember correctly he just told him that he had more trilogies planned.
Otherwise is has always been and will always be, "I couldn't care less" which implies you don't care.
unless that person was part of the active pop culture that put STAR WARS on the map and read voraciously the magazines and articles and interviews of the day.
But what's the maximum resolution of film? Surely there's a limit to that too....
Last time I quoted a magazine from "back in the day" (official SW poster mag) its legitimacy was questioned.
The majority of movies are being shot digitally today. The most common hi-end digital film camera is currently the Alexa by Arri with it's native format being 2880x2160. This is basically referred to as 3k even though it is just shy of 3000 pixels at its width. Most films will down-res this to 2048 or 2k and that is still the standard working resolution of most post productions.
Film, when it is still used. (Nolan shoots on film as do a few other diehards) is commonly scanned at 2048x1156 (2k). For shots where post blow-ups or lots of detail is needed it will be scanned at 4k (4096 pixels across). When dealing with actual film, the grain (produced by silver halide crystals) are inherent in the film. Different film stocks and lighting conditions dictate how significant the grain is. Scanning at a higher resolution at a point will no longer give better clarity as pretty soon the pixels are smaller than the grain and there is nothing that con be done with that
For comparison IMAX native film is 6K square. It is a huge format and the majority of what you see as IMAX presentations are actually up-rez'd from 2k or at 3k if digitally acquired at that resolution.
At the time of TPM the Alexa by Arri was not available. At the time Panavision was working on a digital format camera (Genesis) and although the sensor was 2k, the technology of feeding what was on the sensor back to the storage device was not fast enough to accommodate the full format so it was truncated both in color depth and overall resolution. Lucas initially had all six existing cameras for the beginning of the PTM shoot. A few months in, all of them were returned as they had severe issues. The most extreme was due to the compression/transfer methods, a horrible magenta chromatic aberration would appear on the edge of anything shot against green. Seeing as how so much of the movie was against green screen this obviously was a huge issue.
While working on the initial tests for Matrix II we used these cameras and could not get anything decent out of them. Our internal R&D guys at Manex assisted in re-writing the compression code to assist in reducing the issues but still was not great.
The current Alexa digital camera is leaps and bounds over anything available for years after the PT was finished. For the record, some of those films are shot on actual celluloid but what parts I am not sure.
PT Yoda was awesome.
Phantom Menace was shot on film.
More importantly, are these guys just wearing socks?
I've never noticed that Big, red, woolly socks...
The majority of movies are being shot digitally today. The most common hi-end digital film camera is currently the Alexa by Arri with it's native format being 2880x2160. This is basically referred to as 3k even though it is just shy of 3000 pixels at its width. Most films will down-res this to 2048 or 2k and that is still the standard working resolution of most post productions.
Film, when it is still used. (Nolan shoots on film as do a few other diehards) is commonly scanned at 2048x1156 (2k). For shots where post blow-ups or lots of detail is needed it will be scanned at 4k (4096 pixels across). When dealing with actual film, the grain (produced by silver halide crystals) are inherent in the film. Different film stocks and lighting conditions dictate how significant the grain is. Scanning at a higher resolution at a point will no longer give better clarity as pretty soon the pixels are smaller than the grain and there is nothing that con be done with that
For comparison IMAX native film is 6K square. It is a huge format and the majority of what you see as IMAX presentations are actually up-rez'd from 2k or at 3k if digitally acquired at that resolution.
At the time of TPM the Alexa by Arri was not available. At the time Panavision was working on a digital format camera (Genesis) and although the sensor was 2k, the technology of feeding what was on the sensor back to the storage device was not fast enough to accommodate the full format so it was truncated both in color depth and overall resolution. Lucas initially had all six existing cameras for the beginning of the PTM shoot. A few months in, all of them were returned as they had severe issues. The most extreme was due to the compression/transfer methods, a horrible magenta chromatic aberration would appear on the edge of anything shot against green. Seeing as how so much of the movie was against green screen this obviously was a huge issue.
While working on the initial tests for Matrix II we used these cameras and could not get anything decent out of them. Our internal R&D guys at Manex assisted in re-writing the compression code to assist in reducing the issues but still was not great.
The current Alexa digital camera is leaps and bounds over anything available for years after the PT was finished. For the record, some of those films are shot on actual celluloid but what parts I am not sure.
Of course it was.
It's almost pointless to argue a point of understanding. You can always default to: what if the source was lying (like Lucas HAS done often). Thus, what "truth" really is there.
There is only what you knew to be "the truth" at a given point in time.
I don't get what difference makes when or if Lucas changed or added stuff. We know the original films where changed numerous times during filming becuase of issues.
Like complaining yoda wasn't designed to be a sword smith...and it's bad becuase Lucas changed it later. Well, if he never changed anything Yoda would have been essentially Jar Jar. He was originally written to be comic relief while Obi was on degoba training luke. It was changed when the actor playing Obi Wan wanted less work and less ties to the film, this resulted in the whole story needing to be changed. All three actually. Things happend with Harrison Ford that resulted in changes. Things happend with the studio that resulted in the original plan of Lukes long lost sister being found in film six or seven or eight being done in film two, thus changing it from some new character to Leia.
The original trilogy was written and planned to be very similar in tone and story to what happend with the PT. it was accidents and problems that actually changed it to a completly different story. Lucas wrote the original. He wrote the changes.
Enter your email address to join: