villainsfan42
Super Freak
Spoiler:He needs a new villain to feel imposing rather than another guy in another iron man like armor.
chuck norris.
Spoiler:He needs a new villain to feel imposing rather than another guy in another iron man like armor.
chuck norris.
chuck norris got his ass whopped by bruce lee ages ago.
I'd say bring on the mandarin
I really think some people are overplaying this 'Iron Man 2 is just a prequel to the Avengers' thing.
Spoiler:Hell, Nick Fury only appeared in a few scenes.
ISpoiler:He needs a new villain to feel imposing rather than another guy in another iron man like armor.
Spoiler:Non Armored villains in Iron Man's lineage are few and far between. 90% of his villains are armored in some fashion and even the ones that originally weren't were eventually revamped into armored villains, look at the latest incarnations of the Mandarin. Armored villains are a given they just need to film and write a knock down drag out fight at the end and give it some resolution.
Spoiler:Well, I thought they were getting there with the whole Justin Hammer thing. The story could have better played out his role as non-mechanised enemy. I wish his role had been carried through to the end instead of the poor man being arrested (on grounds that would NEVER be accepted by police in the real world)
What 'The Dark Knight' did better than most superhero films was to create a villain whose threat to the protagonist was not based on physical strength but on a threat to the underlying bases of the protagonist as 'hero'. Justin Hammer, you coulda been a contender.
Spoiler:Well, I thought they were getting there with the whole Justin Hammer thing. The story could have better played out his role as non-mechanised enemy. I wish his role had been carried through to the end instead of the poor man being arrested (on grounds that would NEVER be accepted by police in the real world)
What 'The Dark Knight' did better than most superhero films was to create a villain whose threat to the protagonist was not based on physical strength but on a threat to the underlying bases of the protagonist as 'hero'. Justin Hammer, you coulda been a contender.
Spoiler:I can definitely see that angle with Hammer but in the comics Hammer was like the Lex Luthor of the Superman cartoons, always in the background supplying villains but never really becoming one because he was like 80. So you'd still get armored villains anyway just with someone constantly in the background.
Fav probably couldn't do dark even of he tried. Way too much comedy running through his veins. Most of it is crap too. Couples retreat anyone?
a question bout the v2 whiplash costume at the finale, hopefully someone could give me an answer (mike, Im lookin at you)Spoiler:when he already got IM and WM at the end of his whips tied down, why did he open his helmet again, when the battle aint over yet? had he kept it on, he would've survived. that is one of the WTF moment in that movie that dont make any sense for me.
Spoiler:He planned to kill Stark and Rhodes. Rhodes was collateral damage really but he wanted to look at Stark and have him see his face before he killed him because he blamed him for his father's downfall. Its one of those "I want you to look into my eyes before I kill you" moments old movies and serials had which ties back to Vanko's character itself. It makes no sense but a lot of history's mistakes and battles lost were made by men who became arrogant and overconfident in their positioning and power. Vanko's fatal flaw was that his honor and desire to crush/destroy Tony Stark and see it with his own eyes that undid him. Its a kin to villains monologuing at the pivotal moments which gives the heroes opportune time to get away
Apples and Oranges. Favreau didn't direct Couples Retreat it was directed by Peter Billingsley (the kid from a Christmas Story). Anyway Couples Retreat wasn't funny.
Spoiler:That they find Thor's Hammer after the credits.
Enter your email address to join: