Iron Man 3 Discussion Thread
- Thread starter The Mike
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
No doubt about it!
No spoiler please. Was there a lot of action or all talk? Some reviewer here said it was boring with no ironman much at all. He also said it was very slow and when the audience was done people seems quite and no too please. I really hated the second one so what's your thoughts on this compared to the second one? Without giving the movie away please. Thanks
I guess there is alot of action, but not alot of Ironman. Was better than the second for sure, but by how much depends on you.
People's DC vs Marvel private parts are showing. Bane and Killian are equally meh.
And that clip is so great it makes me sad. Nothing in IM2 or 3 comes close to touching that.
Biojex
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2008
- Messages
- 23,682
- Reaction score
- 173
Maybe not, but I'd say the scene where IM and WM take on the Hammer drones in IM2 is pretty damn cool.
On a fully equipped sound system, WM's guns sound incredible.
On a fully equipped sound system, WM's guns sound incredible.
Yeah, that scene is pretty cool, too. And I agree on WM's guns. I still remember the SDCC preview footage the year before and how badass that was.
Biojex
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2008
- Messages
- 23,682
- Reaction score
- 173
I like how they use "oil" in place of blood as well. Neat idea.
Too bad the scene is so brief. And too bad we didn't get any scenes in IM3 of IM/WM tag teaming some bad guys
Too bad the scene is so brief. And too bad we didn't get any scenes in IM3 of IM/WM tag teaming some bad guys
Lots of better movies then Im3 its good but not the greatest.
jye4ever
Broke and happy
I like how they use "oil" in place of blood as well. Neat idea.
Too bad the scene is so brief. And too bad we didn't get any scenes in IM3 of IM/WM tag teaming some bad guys
It was and still is awesome, like you said, great for a home theater.
Shame nothing like that in an expanded manner in IM3.
How could Marvel not know fans wanted to see a big IM/IP (or WM) team up battle.
Last edited:
ExMem-LarjaThwei
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2010
- Messages
- 10,762
- Reaction score
- 18
I'm talking about Ironman (the first film). That was in response to the clip ironwez or whoever posted.
Haven't seen IM3 yet.
jye4ever
Broke and happy
What, you're not happy with all the scenes of Rhodey running around with his jeans swinging around like tarzan.
Rhodey decided to be a hero while in jeans and tshirt, but while inside the IP armor he just allowed baddies to take him down.
Rhodey decided to be a hero while in jeans and tshirt, but while inside the IP armor he just allowed baddies to take him down.
Biojex
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2008
- Messages
- 23,682
- Reaction score
- 173
I believe they assimilated Crimson Dynamo into Whiplash.
Deckard
Super Freak
I hope we eventually see the effects from IM2 of other country's governments developing suits. He said most were about 5-10 years away. If we get IM4 they should do something like China getting a bunch of their own suits. Iron Man vs a dozen Whiplashes.
Uncanny Web-Slinger
Super Freak
Still confused over the Thor post credits one. Or should i say how the Avengers messed with it.
Loki was on Earth after letting go of Thor, but he was invisible or in the mind of Selvig, then in Avengers he's somehow off in deep spcae and working for Thanos
Me too, i pictured laser blasts
Iron Man hasn't exaclty got alot of Villains to exploit and yet they're shortening that by merging villains like Whiplash/Dynamo and Killian/Mandarin
While I have some issue with TDKR I never felt that Batman was not in it enough. I bet he has at least as much screen time as TDK and more then BB.
However I think Bruce Wayne himself might be in it less. That is the great thing about TDK series. They Bruce so well that it felt like Batman was on the screen even when he was not dressed up as the Bat.
While I am not in love with what they did with Bane I did not mind it. Now had he taken off his mask and told bathroom jokes and was a buffoon then I would have been pretty upset. More then I was at IM3 but I have more invested in TDK films and comics then I do IM.
I hated the Talia twist though. Saw it coming from the start and her character was about as exciting as Killians.
JonWes
Super Freak
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2009
- Messages
- 4,688
- Reaction score
- 20
I assumed that Loki influenced Selvig and maybe maneuvered him into setting up the cube in the SHIELD base to allow him to be transported there.
It doesn't seem like, between Loki and Thanos, that there would be too much difficulty in getting Loki wherever he wanted to be. But by using the cosmic cube for transportation, it put Loki right in the middle of the base, bypassing all the security.
That's the only thing that really made sense of that.
jye4ever
Broke and happy
Still confused over the Thor post credits one. Or should i say how the Avengers messed with it.
Loki was on Earth after letting go of Thor, but he was invisible or in the mind of Selvig, then in Avengers he's somehow off in deep spcae and working for Thanos
He was either sent to earth already to spy on the tesseract then report back or he did this on his own, never really explained.
It was there just to show his whereabouts after falling into the cosmos and also show that the tesseract would be the important plot for Avengers.
But it's left to our interpretation if he's actually controlling Selvig, just spying on Selvig or he's really Selvig and his true form is shown in the reflection.
Similar threads
