MMS Diecast - Iron Man: 1/6th scale Mark III Collectible Figure

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I also like the way if it's said in a meme or gif it don't count to. Posting a pulp fiction gif where Sam Jackson curses someone out as your response to something is NO different then that person saying exactly that. It's the current flipping the bird. And I've seen a guy beat down for flipping the bird to the wrong person.

That a threat sweetheart?
 
pulpfiction-fonzies.jpg
 
Shut the hell up and LIKE IT!


Sorry, what? :monkey3

:nana:

Yes it has movement. All you have to do is look at Jingobells and PEs photos.

Apparently not the articulation I'm after, which is not huge but greater than the 0.2mm number you referenced. At any rate I think we agree that it's a gorgeous piece, but I'll be passing on it because of my idiosyncratic taste in high-priced superhero dolls. ;)


There is zero articulation in the chest and the ab. Meaning the upper torso area also doesn't swivel left and right the way it does now on current IM figures.

The arms also don't come out the way they do on the Mark 42/43/etc. The section that's outlined remains facing forward all together due to them being connected together through a peg.

y4hj4K6.jpg

Right, if this is correct, I'm sadly out and will wait and see if they do a Mark IV more to my taste.


Word has it some bad things may have happened in here :lol :monkey3

Just nerd-rage. Move along. ;)
 
Cannot wait for the MKIII. I have been posing my StarBoost and war machine Diecast in anticipation. Can't wait to have the 3 in the detolf.

Another thing... I attempted the flight pose landing thingy today with the WM mkII and I found it difficult and couldn't properly get it (even after watching videos). I was wondering if you guys who have the figure or opinions on how much easier the MK3 diecast would be to do the landing pose with that twisted torso.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Been playing around with my Mk II AU again, and I have to say I really wish they'd retooled this figure into a Mk III a few years back. It's honestly still pretty great.

efynH3y.jpg


I think I'm going to wait and see if they announce a Mk III Battle Damage 2.0 or a Diecast Mk IV before picking this up.
 
They should just keep making plastic figures. Keeps the cost down and you only really notice the die cast difference in weight.

Though I'm mainly getting this for the better proportions.
 
Eh i cant even bring myself to call this diecast, only 3 areas are even diecast. The whole thing should have just been plastic.

I suppose one upside to that is most of the diecast is localised in the legs, so it'll be nice and stable with the weight there keeping the figure anchored.
 
Life's already stressful as it is so I try not to get too picky with my toys. :)

It looks relatively good and accurate, it isn't flimsy, it can do decent number of poses. I'm good to go. :wink1:
 
Last edited:
Been playing around with my Mk II AU again, and I have to say I really wish they'd retooled this figure into a Mk III a few years back. It's honestly still pretty great.

efynH3y.jpg


I think I'm going to wait and see if they announce a Mk III Battle Damage 2.0 or a Diecast Mk IV before picking this up.
I really wanted to pull of the roof scene looking like this uploadfromtaptalk1436521793711.jpg
 
Back
Top