MMS Diecast - Iron Man: 1/6th scale Mark III Collectible Figure

[zackhigh1226]

My money for HT Mark 3 is gone largely due to the failure to resist this:View attachment 200970

I approve! The Mark 42 is a really cool and unique armor, and in my opinion it's one of Hot Toys' best Iron Man figures.

 

[jeremychng]

I approve! The Mark 42 is a really cool and unique armor, and in my opinion it's one of Hot Toys' best Iron Man figures.

Agreed! I got lucky that my local figure store had this on the shelf and I couldn't pass up the chance.

 

[bullet1217]

My money for HT Mark 3 is gone largely due to the failure to resist this:View attachment 200970

Congrats! Welcome to the XLII Club

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

[Manannin]

My money for HT Mark 3 is gone largely due to the failure to resist this:View attachment 200970

Ah XLII was my first Iron Man. What a slippery slope that started...
Congrats!

 

[jeremychng]

Thanks!

 

[jeremychng]

Congrats! Welcome to the XLII Club

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Cheers!

 

[Brainiac]

Congrats! Welcome to the XLII Club

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Thats a thing

 

[Manannin]

I was thinking about all the discussion about ab crunch and articulation. Since some people said the landing pose has been possible without the swap out piece since about Mark 4 onwards, I thought I would test it myself.
Since Mark 4 is MMS 123, then being a later release, MMS 168 should be able to do it too right? Right. Nailed it.

 

[skizzoid]

I was thinking about all the discussion about ab crunch and articulation. Since some people said the landing pose has been possible without the swap out piece since about Mark 4 onwards, I thought I would test it myself.
Since Mark 4 is MMS 123, then being a later release, MMS 168 should be able to do it too right? Right. Nailed it.

View attachment 201310

I think it needs to be in more pieces.

 

[Y4NK33 PL4N3T]

 

[bebe13junior]

I was thinking about all the discussion about ab crunch and articulation. Since some people said the landing pose has been possible without the swap out piece since about Mark 4 onwards, I thought I would test it myself.
Since Mark 4 is MMS 123, then being a later release, MMS 168 should be able to do it too right? Right. Nailed it.

View attachment 201310

Hahahhaa. Epic!
It seems like from some of the reviewers that this is the best figure in which to attain the Landing Pose. Cannot wait!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[MedievaL]

I was thinking about all the discussion about ab crunch and articulation. Since some people said the landing pose has been possible without the swap out piece since about Mark 4 onwards, I thought I would test it myself.
Since Mark 4 is MMS 123, then being a later release, MMS 168 should be able to do it too right? Right. Nailed it.

 

[Graham_UK]

This has probably been covered before but in Iron Man 1 he doesn't do the 3 point landing! The only time he lands (Sort of) like that is when he does a 4 point landing.

 

[wamphyri13]

Doesn't he do the 3 point landing pose when he lands in Gulmira?
Ryan
Nevermind - just watched a clip of it. He lands with both arms out, not on the ground.

 

[bransen2099]

Doesn't he do the 3 point landing pose when he lands in Gulmira?
Ryan

It's actually a kneeling pose, him bending over with both his arms stretched to his sides. He never does the pose, only in a promo pics

 

[Chr0n0]

It's actually a kneeling pose, him bending over with both his arms stretched to his sides. He never does the pose, only in a promo pics

Indeed it is.

 

[Y4NK33 PL4N3T]

It's actually a kneeling pose, him bending over with both his arms stretched to his sides. He never does the pose, only in a promo pics

Spoiler

It's a better pose too.

 

[Jaymas]

He never does the pose, only in a promo pics

Well, why doesn't that count as an iconic image we would want to reproduce with a figure to represent the first Iron Man movie? The promo picture is part of the movie's history and is one of the most iconic images imbedded in our memory of the character. The image may have been one of the first we ever saw of Iron Man even before we saw the film and it obviously made such an impression that they would incorporate this landing pose in the squeals.

It's actually a kneeling pose, him bending over with both his arms stretched to his sides.

This is also a really cool pose, I would love to see if the figure could get in a pose like this one too (with the head a bit further up than the frame in my screen capture)

 

[bransen2099]

Indeed it is.

Damn I need to watch IM1 again, such a great movie.

Spoiler

It's a better pose too.

It is... To bad it's impossible to recreate in real life

Well, why doesn't that count as an iconic image we would want to reproduce with a figure to represent the first Iron Man movie? The promo picture is part of the movie's history and is one of the most iconic images imbedded in our memory of the character. The image may have been one of the first we ever saw of Iron Man even before we saw the film and it obviously made such an impression that they would incorporate this landing pose in the squeals.

View attachment 201679

I didn't say it was or wasn't iconic to the movie. I was just stating the fact he didn't do that pose in the movie.

Now I can say I didn't even see that promo pic until after I saw the movie.
This one was shown at my theatre

And I wouldn't say that THAT image has left a big impression. Iron Man has been doing that landing pose in the comics

As you can see, copyrighted in 2006 top left corner. 2 years before IM1 came out

 

[Brainiac]

Damn I need to watch IM1 again, such a great movie.

That it is I actually rewatched it not to long ago, still one of my Top Marvel movies, in 4th place being stalked by Ant Man