Star-Crunch
Super Freak
- Joined
- May 9, 2017
- Messages
- 2,747
- Reaction score
- 459
Definitely leave it matte. I always preferred a more dull finish. For some reason, high gloss just make it feel cheap imo.
I've been meaning to do this for awhile, but I finally got my Mark 3 repainted after taking some inspiration from Inigou's repaint way back from 2015 in this thread. I airbrushed on the same smoke color he used, but decided to go just a bit darker than he did to try to match the burgundy of the movie and in the old Art Of book I have. And I also lightly brushed the gold parts with steel wool to give it more of that brushed metal look it had. The biggest pain of course was masking everything off first, which took freakin forever to do.
Obviously the figure is still a bit underscaled and lacking in articulation, but I didn't really feel like waiting for HT to make another more improved version. And I suspect even if they did, it still wouldn't be the right color anyway.
View attachment 406597
Mark 6 all the way
Said to say... but I would recommend getting anything except the Diecast Mk 3. Even if you're ok with the color and size, the figure is extremely lacking in articulation and just not nearly as fun to pose or work with as something like the Mk 6.
how do you guys feel about the diecast mark 3?
i’ve seen tons of reviews and i know the articulation has been a con of this particular one. as well as the height and paint.
i was looking to buy one and a local comic book store has one for $280 after tax. they also have the mark 45 but i think it’s closer to $400. another store has the mark 6 for $360. all diecast.
i don’t own any iron man for that matter so i’m not too concerned with the price compared to getting a really good one. i’d hate to buy one and it be the lesser quality one.
considering it’s my first one i’m a little turned away from the 45 due to no stark face. i feel like that should be something i should have.
however i’d be remiss if i didn’t say i’m a little drawn to the mark 3 due to the price but more so coupled with the fact it’s an iconic armor and one of my favorites.
would you consider buying either of these or is there another one that you recommend more?
Yep, it’s worth the extra. I really like the mk3, a lot more then most here, but the mk6 is the best figure hot toys has done so far. As for the price..I’d say it’s worth it. The mk50 is over 400 most places anyway so it seems in line.
Thanks! Here's the Amazon link to the paint I used. I definitely wouldn't risk using a spray can though. It was thinned down quite a bit for the airbrush, so that it could go on as a very fine spray, but with a can it would go on a whole lot heavier and be a lot harder to control (and if you tried holding the can back further you'd just end up with tons of obvious little specks).
https://www.amazon.com/Wicked-Colors-water-based-universal-SprayGunner/dp/B01HYCV5Q4/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1525587715&sr=8-4&keywords=airbrush+smoke
how do you guys feel about the diecast mark 3?
i’ve seen tons of reviews and i know the articulation has been a con of this particular one. as well as the height and paint.
i was looking to buy one and a local comic book store has one for $280 after tax. they also have the mark 45 but i think it’s closer to $400. another store has the mark 6 for $360. all diecast.
i don’t own any iron man for that matter so i’m not too concerned with the price compared to getting a really good one. i’d hate to buy one and it be the lesser quality one.
considering it’s my first one i’m a little turned away from the 45 due to no stark face. i feel like that should be something i should have.
however i’d be remiss if i didn’t say i’m a little drawn to the mark 3 due to the price but more so coupled with the fact it’s an iconic armor and one of my favorites.
would you consider buying either of these or is there another one that you recommend more?
Considering picking this up.
IM is my favorite marvel film aside from Spider-Man HC. Also love IW so trying to decide which IM to get (one from one of those).
Any input from experts out there?
Thanks!
I Imagine you’ll be able to pick this one up quite cheap, the IW armour is very expensive. General consensus on here is that this figure is undersized, it certainly looks small standing next to the recent DC armours. Also the solid waist section hurts the poseability but the interchangeable torso bit does allow a fairly convincing landing pose. And there’s no ankle rocker, and no extendable shoulders...
Thank you for the input.
No problem, I hope it helps your decision making process. I should probably add that I do actually like the figure, the armour is a classic design. I just keep it on a separate shelf in the landing pose so the scale issue isn’t so apparent.
Enter your email address to join: