Star Wars: The Last Jedi (Dec 15th, 2017)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi SPOILER DISCUSSION THREAD

:lol I was just joking.

I'd need to see her naked to really know though. Do you have a picture like that?

:lol Whaaa!? I mean she’s hot but..you’re kinda overboard haha
 
My brain still can't process the fact that there isn't a single lightsaber on lightsaber fight in this movie.
That and the fact that the green lightsaber only appeared in awful flashbacks.

How do you sit down, write this, and tell yourself it's a good idea? How?

If Rian's trilogy treats Force users and Force lore this way, it's going to be my worst cinematic nightmare (well, next to TLJ).

That was disturbing wasn’t it :thud:
 
I kind of agree with what this guy had to say. He left this comment on the Star Wars conference video that is on Youtube. Google did the best it could to translate:

Star wars already have not only read or read and without carrie no longer makes sense, mark is more than tired and out of place, star wars is more than exhausted and worn out, too stretched something out of context and generation does not say anything, I lived as a child the first trilogy and I am clear in the prequels that star wars was, is and will be the first, and everything else is just want to make money. this new trilogy does not contribute anything, they will be better and all that, but without their protagonists now and over after so many years it does not say anything, it is not that the movies are bad it's just that star wars is a story with characters and actors for a time and generation and everything has a beginning and end and not recognize that leads to the tiredness and abhorrence at the end mark hamill and his face expresses it better than what I say, this arto, no longer age and above is left alone with new people that they had not been born when he was the star of the story, now aged after the time he is seen more out of place than as star of the movies.

Sent from my SM-N920S using Tapatalk
 
George said it was beautifully made. Says it all... He probably hated most of it.

This movie is the opposite of what he would have done if he had any input for TLJ. And yes, just input, of course he shouldn't have directed it or written any of the dialogue. Well, tbh, some of the dialogue (humor) was absolutely awful anyway.
 
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi SPOILER DISCUSSION THREAD

I also need to see her naked...just to make sure. Definitely just to make sure.
 
It's just, man, Hamill said he fundamentally disagreed, fundamentally.

Whatever they do next, it's in line with their TFA/TLJ approach.

Isn’t this like Mark though..he always was compassionate and a rebel to directors. Remember he fought tooth and nail to have Lucas change the dialogue Luke said in the infamous bullseye speech in ANH :lol
 
Or he'll become the most evil man in the galaxy.

latest




Wow this hurts.

Damn that was hard to watch.
 
George said it was beautifully made. Says it all... He probably hated most of it.

This movie is the opposite of what he would have done if he had any input for TLJ. And yes, just input, of course he shouldn't have directed it or written any of the dialogue. Well, tbh, some of the dialogue (humor) was absolutely awful anyway.

He probably said that while thinking of his big payoff that Disney gave him for the rights :lol
 
Why'd you sign up for that then Mark? Did you have no input at all? Were they not going to take Luke Skywalker himself seriously about how Luke should be written?
 
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi SPOILER DISCUSSION THREAD

No disrespect , but there is no Leia without Carrie..big mistake having Leia live and Luke die. Even with phenomenal CG effects in EP IX , how can they possibly pull off having Leia ..now I know they figured originally, Carrie would film EP IX , but they could’ve changed Leia’s fate after her passing. :thud:
I initially thought that she was going to die in a coma in universe - it made me a little uncomfortable because that would have been eerie foreshadowing for what fate she met in reality. But I agree with you - I think she should have been the one to send the ship to light speed and send Holdo with the resistance.
 
Oh hell no and broomstick boy better not be endgame for EP IX either..JJ don’t you dare! :gah:
 
He probably signed a contract before Episode 8 was even written.

Definitely.

And he isn't rich/powerful enough to just get out of it due to disagreements on where the script is going. It's him vs Disney.
Robert Downey Jr. can do that, Harrison Ford can do that, not Mark Hamill. Unfortunately.
 
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi SPOILER DISCUSSION THREAD

A review of TLJ in one picture:

limp-lightsaber.jpg
 
Definitely.

And he isn't rich/powerful enough to just get out of it due to disagreements on where the script is going. It's him vs Disney.
Robert Downey Jr. can do that, Harrison Ford can do that, not Mark Hamill. Unfortunately.

Harrison was smart..he only returned on his terms
 
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi SPOILER DISCUSSION THREAD

And I’m glad you brought that up too because I’ve also seen some shade thrown at the MCU in this thread... “they’re trying to turn Star Wars into a Marvel movie!” First of all, no, not even close. Secondly, if it were the case, is it so terrible because Marvel movies are horrible pieces of junk? Lol, well then now I see why so many people are drinking Haterade here. If Marvel movies are a low bar to set, then I see very little chance JJ will be getting any love here come winter 2019.

For me I'd put it slightly differently. If I was to say, 'They're screwing it up by trying to add Marvel movie humour!' I would mean that they are trying to imitate Marvel and coming off poorly. The humour works in the Marvel movies. It's a part of their formula. It's baked deep into the mix, and Marvel loves their Whedon-esque lampshading asides. We love 'em. And that stuff is fine if it is an intended part of the package. And it works when you have talented scriptwriters baking it in from the get-go.

Like you say, it works in Thor, because it's part and parcel of what the movie is. If you add lampshading jokes to franchises that haven't been that way before, it's adding a layer of irony and detachment and self-awareness ('we're in a movie and look at how much we're joking about being in a movie!') that undercuts tension and suspension of disbelief in a bad way. In a Marvel movie the humour, built in from the start, might be a clever breath of fresh air, undercutting tropes, and opening out the narrative, and taking away some of the pressure of established comic book beats we know are coming. 'Don't worry, if he turns out to be evil we'll just kill him!' But if Star Wars characters or Batman become aware they are characters in a movie, then we've suddenly been pulled through the fourth wall, punched, and put back again, and the joke has just undermined drama and characterisation rather than adding to our enjoyment.

Long story short: humour in Marvel movies is great. It's the weak facsimiles of humour in Marvel movies, written by unfunny people and jammed into existing properties where it thematically doesn't fit, that frustrates people. Plus, it comes across as 'You are trying to be a Marvel movie, because Marvel movies are fun and popular.' You shouldn't be thinking of a better movie while watching something. If you know a film is trying to please you by blatantly imitating something better then you immediately know it is second best. When you can feel those real world concerns creeping in you are taken out of the movie as well.

Superman's 'Do you bleed?' is an example here. Justice League had a lot of examples. Suddenly those characters were all ironic and knew they were in a movie. They were making jokes and performing for a crowd that did not exist in their world, instead of making jokes to each other. Superman knows full well Batman bleeds. Even as a threat it came off wrong, because why would you threaten someone by giving their previous threat cred by repeating it. Maybe if you were weak and felt fear and were striking out in terror you would mimic someone's threat back at them. If you were Superman, and could crush a guy in an instant, why would you even give him the satisfaction of knowing you were hurt enough by his previous threat to mimic it back word-for-word? It was a joke made by a guy who knew he was in a movie, and it didn't fit the established feel of the universe. Same with laser swords, blue milk, 'you've changed your hair', etc.

I think part of what the film was doing WAS trying to comment on Star Wars as a phenomenon in the real world. There is nothing else like Star Wars. But I'm not sure it entirely works. Star Wars has always 'rhymed', but once it becomes completely self-referential there is a risk we disappear down a navel-gazing rabbit hole, to mix my metaphors very poorly. You're not referencing a genre. You're referencing Star Wars, because Star Wars is so huge it's a thing unto itself, culturally.

And you can comment on Star Wars subtly, without having the characters themselves lampshade Star Wars tropes through comic asides. As someone else very observantly pointed out here (and I wish I could work out how to 'rep' people on these boards), the joke about Rey using the lightsaber and knocking the stone onto the cart those Stations from Bill and Ted 2 were pushing was a Star Wars joke. That worked. It happened in-universe and was funny to us. We like humour in Star Wars. But the lampshading jokes? If you are being ironic about something then it suggests you are slightly embarrassed by it. You are being guarded. People are ready and willing to embrace Star Wars 100%. You don't have to be detached, ironic, and 'too cool for Star Wars' in a Star Wars movie. It feels like a bratty teenage thing to do, and Star Wars is about wide-eyed childhood wonder.
 
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi SPOILER DISCUSSION THREAD

Heres the problem with these multi movie franchises. Instead of having one director see the project through, its like some half ass attempt at letting everyone get a chance to direct (see everyone gets a medal mentality). If you have 1 director for the trilogy, there can at least be some semblance of continuity. And if a director says they only want to direct one movie, get rid of them. They obviously have NO interest in the project if they are unwilling to commit to 3 movies.

I'm not sure if this was a studio decision or some stupid JJ Abrams decision that led to this debacle.

They were supposedly trying to recreate what went down with the OT. They thought maybe that was part of what kept the movies interesting. At least that was their marketing about it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top