You're low, in my opinion. In the first place, the extent of your literacy is suspect. In the second place, you read my post exactly how a person who thinks that other people's moral character is dependent on how much they will sacrifice for other people without thinking twice. You think people are obligated to help another just because they come begging for it? Without question? Without knowing whether or not they deserve it? I'm not talking about something as casual as being polite (although imposing yourself on someone by asking for help can be the epitome of rudeness). I'm talking about people who live as congenital dependents on the good will of others, exploiting their lives, time and money because they're too degenerate to lift a finger for their damned selves, and they know that there will always be a sucker's generosity to use to their advantage. If you don't bother to make that distinction when charity mongers come grovelling, I wish a thousand needy, hustling leeches upon you. I hope they give you lots of warm, fuzzy, cannibalized feelings. Maybe someone will make you a saint and you can feel even more superior to people like me who value their selves enough to not live for the sake of other people's helplessness.
My parents taught me that I'm not a slave, that no one owes me something for nothing, that it is for me to decide who I will be kind to, and that I am not obligated to anyone against my own choice. They also taught me that people who boast about how charitable they are, are anything but charitable, and that there is nothing lower than someone who holds their own selflessness as a claim to a superior self.
They had too much self-respect to believe otherwise.
.Well you have some views there. You say it's corrupt for an able person to help an unable person, that is a pretty stupid statement, you should clarify what an unable person is, an old man or woman, the handicap OR a lazy Freeloader. You should be more specific when making a statement like that. 
