- Joined
- Sep 25, 2006
- Messages
- 5,040
- Reaction score
- 3,874
Gotta try and stop the false narrative here as well ![Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl: 🤣](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png)
![Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl: 🤣](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png)
My InArt Joker is STOCK. Never touched up, never thinned out any hair.
Now I am aware that later batches feature an over abundance of hair…it’s unfortunate and it can and has soured collectors experiences. But their flawed figure(s) doesn’t accurately represent how it’s SUPPOSED to look and not everyone got crappy jokers. InArt absolutely need to atone for their **** ups with regards to later batches or the ones that slipped through QC inspection…but to say HT repurposed sculpt outclasses InArt’s is…well…it is a take.
Prefer it over IA’s? Understandable. But better? Ehhh, subjective.
![Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl: 🤣](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png)
![Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl: 🤣](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png)
![IMG_3177.jpeg IMG_3177.jpeg](https://cdn.imagearchive.com/sideshowcollectors/data/attach/524/524538-IMG-3177.jpeg)
![IMG_3178.jpeg IMG_3178.jpeg](https://cdn.imagearchive.com/sideshowcollectors/data/attach/524/524539-IMG-3178.jpeg)
My InArt Joker is STOCK. Never touched up, never thinned out any hair.
Now I am aware that later batches feature an over abundance of hair…it’s unfortunate and it can and has soured collectors experiences. But their flawed figure(s) doesn’t accurately represent how it’s SUPPOSED to look and not everyone got crappy jokers. InArt absolutely need to atone for their **** ups with regards to later batches or the ones that slipped through QC inspection…but to say HT repurposed sculpt outclasses InArt’s is…well…it is a take.
Prefer it over IA’s? Understandable. But better? Ehhh, subjective.