Well, I took pics with the Stark head but the lighting sucks and my camera is ancient, amazed it still even works
I haven't been resizing these pics, hope that's not screwing people up too much.
Ok, back to the headsculpt. I tried getting shots of it and comparing photos on the web that's from Endgame (movie or promotional materials) just to get an idea why it's off. My conclusion is the jaw line needs to be straightened a bit and widened as well. The tip of the nose may be a bit too pointy as well and needs to be flattened a bit. The details are there and phone cameras tend to smoothen or wash out the wrinkles. So ditch the iPhones and get something better. It wouldn't hurt though to make those details more obvious or deepen the lines when they fix the sculpt. I don't like the paint used on the hair as it looks like bronze that's leaning close to being metallic. That said, the details can be better appreciated in-hand but that doesn't mean the sculpt isn't off. It's RDJ's Endgame doppelganger or maybe Tony Stank at best. At least though, I don't feel it's another actor/actress or another ethnicity/race.
View attachment 503666
View attachment 503667
View attachment 503668
View attachment 503669
View attachment 503670
View attachment 503671
View attachment 503672
And for those giving it positive and glowing reviews even, I got you covered:
https://www.healthgrades.com/ophthalmology-directory
Use it well.
View attachment 503661
View attachment 503664
The traps are possibly a posing thing. I lowered the shoulders, think I also pulled them out and brought them forward a bit, hence the lack of smooth transitions in that area.
The pics look great. Thanks.
I just wanted to see the head on a clothed body, or similar. Like how it scales off the armour. I really want to pick up that unhelmeted sculpt. I might even try and pick up the entire armour just to get the head and then sell the armour again.
Positioning aside, the overall shape of this figure looks nothing like the prototype.
Hmm, it's a shame the more tapered/organic silhouette of the back from the prototype is gone now and what we get instead is something more jagged and rickety with the sharp edges...ugh!
Looking at the figure again in person, the upper body is definitely different from the prototype - more of a square silhouette. I suspect the internal lines and details are different also.
By reactions here I assume then that the prototype was more accurate?
If we're talking about the armor itself, the silhouette looks better on the prototype. However, the details are different and the final product is more screen accurate.
Oh. OK well the only clothed figure of a normal sized man that I have is the T-1000. And as a matter of curiosity I popped off the T-1000's head with a view to testing the Stark head on it when I realized
View attachment 503685
I think that socket would have to be popped out. The Stark head is noticeably larger than the T-1000 head in any case.
Ok, back to the headsculpt. I tried getting shots of it and comparing photos on the web that's from Endgame (movie or promotional materials) just to get an idea why it's off. My conclusion is the jaw line needs to be straightened a bit and widened as well. The tip of the nose may be a bit too pointy as well and needs to be flattened a bit. The details are there and phone cameras tend to smoothen or wash out the wrinkles. So ditch the iPhones and get something better. It wouldn't hurt though to make those details more obvious or deepen the lines when they fix the sculpt. I don't like the paint used on the hair as it looks like bronze that's leaning close to being metallic. That said, the details can be better appreciated in-hand but that doesn't mean the sculpt isn't off. It's RDJ's Endgame doppelganger or maybe Tony Stank at best. At least though, I don't feel it's another actor/actress or another ethnicity/race.
View attachment 503666
View attachment 503667
View attachment 503668
View attachment 503669
View attachment 503670
View attachment 503671
View attachment 503672
And for those giving it positive and glowing reviews even, I got you covered:
https://www.healthgrades.com/ophthalmology-directory
Use it well.
Rotated. Thanks for these, the figure looks quite good here. I do think it's lost some of the proto's shape to its slight detriment, but as I've said several times, it's not bad. Just a little disappointed for such an important release, but they can't all be perfect.
View attachment 503739
View attachment 503740
Enter your email address to join: