Vorithon
Freakzoid
So how about that Kylo Ren figure. Looks pretty good. What do you guys think
So how about that Kylo Ren figure. Looks pretty good. What do you guys think
So how about that Kylo Ren figure. Looks pretty good. What do you guys think
Lol denial? Show me evidence to support your claims of Disney/JJ ignoring the PT. Show me where Howard said HT is skipping the PT.
The lack of an Adam Driver head sculpt is disappointing.
Yah that's the only think that really holding me back aside from all the other figures I have ordered. Its a great time and a bad time to be a Stars Wars collector $$$$
Disney and JJ have stated that they are moving away from the PT on several occasions. JJ's "we're going practical" announcements -- of which there are many -- is clearly a jab at the oversaturated CG PT.
You probably would, because people would think that you were trolling. However, people in this thread have categorically stated that they don't think the OT are perfect movies. Keep in mind that we are the people arguing that the prequels are bad here. Perfect is a big word. I could come up with many OT flaws if I wanted to, but that's a waste of my time. There are flaws. They exist. No one in this thread is denying that, so why are you trying to tell us that we think that way?
I'm not exaggerating. It looks like a computer animated cartoon. Here's a link to a bigger version of the picture, it's got a higher resolution. For some reason I couldn't get it to link at this size.
That looks like something someone built in a computer, not a bunch of real aliens standing in a real forest.
Exactly what I'm saying. People who like these movies are filling in the gaps with assumptions, not what's actually in the movie. Samuel L. Jackson is not Samuel L. Jackson in these movies. He is Mace Windu. And if the only way people can describe him is that he's SLJ, then the movie fails to characterise him in any way other than the actor being who he is.
Take the original Star Wars for example. Harrison Ford is not Harrison Ford. Harrison Ford is Han Solo - a cocky smuggler with a heart of gold, who becomes friends with Luke Skywalker over the course of the movie. Take Vito Corleone from The Godfather. The whole way the opening scenes of that film are structured presents him as a person of great power and influence. The horse head scene - again, showing what lengths he will go to to get results. Brilliant characterisation, performance etc by Marlon Brando. In that movie, Marlon Brando does not play Marlon Brando. He plays another, entirely different person. It's called acting.
Nothing about the way the PT is either shot or written portrays Mace Windu as anything other than an emotionless robot that happens to be the biggest bad mother ****er in Hollywood.
Actually, 200 of his friends died. It was a massacre! They only 'won' because Yoda conveniently turned up before the remaining 20 Jedi were slaughtered by several thousand robots. And that started a galactic war. Go figure.
Lack of relatable characterisation makes George Lucas clueless, not me.
She shows signs of distress - and then the scene ends before we see anything more. She doesn't show no emotion at all! Watch the scene again! And she still shows other characteristics throughout the films - she's a strong character can think tactically and take control of situations. She acts with far more humanity than nearly any of the characters in the prequels.
....
The STAR WARS section really should be broken into TWO sections: OT and PT.
But then the PT section would only be populated by WWEJedi, SKINT and Motux.
Hmmmmmm..... not a bad idea actually.
You're in for a surprise.
Not every PT fan wants to speak up against pricks like Pixelpiper - who bash the PT and people who like it with every post. Some people just ignore that ****.
I'm tired of ignoring it because no poster deserves to belittle people openly on a forum without opposition or reprimand. You don't like the PT? Great. Just don't call me an idiot for liking it.
Coz she don't get mad. She get even.
As Princess - leader of the Rebel Alliance, no less - she must maintain perfect grace under unbelievable pressure, and be seen to be doing so. Indeed, in front of Tarkin and Vader, an emotional breakdown would be tantamount to surrender and, indeed, a betrayal. She's just viewed the destruction of a planet, with millions of people being murdered, and for her to succumb to mere emotion would be almost an insult to those killed. As she says later, with perfect composure: "We have no time for our sorrows..."
Leia is a leader for a reason: stoic, brave, commanding. Indeed, it's these very traits that make her such a respected figure - and, pointedly, represent the weakest point in her armour that Han Solo targets when attempting to seduce her. Her 'iciness', her inclination to prioritise the needs of the Alliance above her own ("We need? Well what about you need?") and her studied distance from emotion indeed become the very subplot of The Empire Strikes Back: Han's pet name of 'Your Worship', and constant references to her exalted royal status more broadly, are direct plays upon her denial of self (and deeper denial of her attraction to him) due to the requirements of being a leader. Indeed, Empire shifts from the icy white terrain of Hoth (where Leia continues to maintain her reserve, albeit with difficulty), to the suggestively gelatinous bowels of an asteroid slug (where Leia succumbs to Han's advances), to the airily warm colours of Cloud City - where Leia finally 'melts' in the steam of the freezing chamber and confesses her love. Coincidence?
So, Leia's perpetual (albeit justified) reserve is thoroughly examined and pursued in the OT; through Kasdan, especially, Leia is no emotionless robot - she is a brave and stoic leader at a cost to herself emotionally, which Solo recognises and addresses and which the OT films slowly chart as driving the awakening on her part. (Indeed, we go from virginal Leia in white in Star Wars, to the poised elegance of Cloud City Leia in Empire, to the bump 'n grind of slavegirl Leia in Jedi. Again, coincidence?)
Leia's emotional conflict between public and private needs is one of the OT's most engaging elements, and a recurring thematic motif throughout all the OT characters.
Mace Windu, on the other hand, is emotionless due to poor writing and lazy casting.
Great post Johnny
I think Wor-Gar was joking.
Count me inna dat one!
But it's not about which trilogy is better - even as a prequel apologist I happily admit the OT reigns supreme. It's about whether the PT deserves the level of unbridled, often irrational, vitriol it receives. It's gotten totally over the top and tends to feed on itself.
Not sure why this battle for the PT continues on and on...
You guys who support the PT without measure have to realize that many fans really have turned on them. The new movies have distanced themselves publicly from them. Even Disney has moved away from them. HT has stated that they will not be making PT figures. There's a reason for all that. There's a reason the PT musters such hatred and ire. The reasons may not make much sense to you, but that doesn't invalidate them no matter how you personally perceive the films.
Look, everyone has their "PT". Some people believe "Goonies" was a good movie. Does not make it so. I firmly believe as you get older you will more clearly see the flaws of the PT, regardless if you ever come around to the OT or not... but you'll always have a soft spot for them.
This thread needs to get nuked.
It's just another stupid OT Vs PT retread.
Goonies was a great movie. OT SW has MANY campy moments, piss poor dialogue- very funy tho, and among my fondest moments of my 7 to 15 movie going years. Yes PT suffers the same fate but many years later for me--comes down to the Lucas-factor; he just wasn't that great. Well, maybe great for a 7 year old, but....
And that is why I collect OT SW, it appeals to my Inner 7 year old. I can't fight that. For members here that love PT, it might be the same.
So how about that Kylo Ren figure. Looks pretty good. What do you guys think
They've actually never stated anything remotely suggesting they're ignoring the PT.
Here's an example for you to "deny": Star Wars: Disney's Solution to the Problem of the Prequels
Specifically:
The Mouse’s strategy for selling fans on the sequel trilogy is as much about distancing itself from the prequels as it is about reinforcing its ties to the original trilogy. Everyone involved in the new Star Wars projects, from J.J. Abrams to Lucasfilm President Kathleen Kennedy and numerous other cast and crew members, have talked our ear off about the emphasis on practical effects, minimal CGI, authentic props and costumes. It’s not enough that the original three leads are returning. Disney wants to assure us that its blue milk came from the same cows as the original trilogy.
And it’s hard to blame Disney for adopting such a logical approach.
They are distancing themselves from the CGI aspects of the films for future film releases, not distancing themselves from the movies themselves.
They are distancing themselves from the CGI aspects of the films for future film releases, not distancing themselves from the movie themselves. If they were going away from the PT they would halt all novels and figures from the PT, as they did with EU, but since this is not the case.... PT is alive, just on the back burner at the moment.... and rightfully so.
Did you even read the article?
Of course they are still releasing PT stuff. For guys like you and SKINT. But we're talking movies here.
Did you even read the article?
Of course they are still releasing PT stuff. For guys like you and SKINT. But we're talking movies here.
There's a rumor right now that Rian Johnson will feature Hayden in Episode VIII. Are you going to boycott Episode VIII?
I hope so.
Enter your email address to join: